Posters in Schools!
Regardless the colloquial use of the concept attitude, there is a rich and definitive body of research on as many as six conceptual and operational definitions of the construct. One of the original constructs was the tripartite (3 part) notion of attitude. Others look at beliefs as only the notion of an individual’s regions of acceptance/rejection in terms of the concept as a judgmental base. To make a long story short I will ask a question.
Why on earth, would a school official allow a poster in his/her building that states, “Only Positive Attitudes Allowed Beyond This Point!?” Attitudes in the true meaning of the construct should be used to predict subsequent behaviors, not as a guide to instruct youngsters that for some odd reason a positive attitude is richer or more meaningful than a negative attitude. Should our students have positive attitudes toward gangs, alcohol, drugs and bullying?
The direction of an attitude, positive/negative, should not be the concern. What we should be concerned with is the substance and nature of particular over-riding attitudes held by parents, students, staff, community, etc. In the future when those in charge put up posters for general instruction/guidance it might be nice if they have a clue as to what the poster is actually saying. In the grand scheme of things attitudes should be productive and instructive. Silliness (ATTsilliness) and ignorance (ATTignorance) are two concepts concerning education that you should hold negative attitudes towards.


4 Comments