Remember to watch for health news follow-ups
I’m happy to see some national follow-ups today on the latest news that statin drugs are apparently a wonder cure for preventing cardiovascular disease.
On Sunday and Monday, newspapers around the country, including The Wenatchee World, reported the latest finding that statins can halve the risk of heart attacks and stroke in people who don’t have high cholesterol. We published the Los Angeles Times story on our front page, which boldly declared the study suggests that “millions more people should be put on a daily regimen” of the drug.
That bothered me a little, and I told my husband so. He countered that this is hugely important, and could benefit so many people. I agree. Half of heart attacks occur in people who do not have high cholesterol. And a simple $20 blood test can tell you if you have arterial inflammation. But nowhere in the article, or others I found online, did the reporters mention that statin drugs are not the ONLY way to reduce or prevent inflammation, which now becoming accepted as another cause of heart disease.
I did read in The Washington Post’s story this quote, “Some experts, however, expressed concern about rushing millions of healthy people onto powerful drugs.” But still no mention of what causes the inflammation.
My worry is that, as a nation, we tend to rush to the drug first, rather than looking for changes in our own habits, and then using drugs as a tool if that isn’t successful. And as reporters, we sometimes buy into the latest research touting the wonders of some of these drugs, without exploring what some of our readers may want to know — namely, ‘What’s the real cause, and what lifestyle changes would prevent it?’ If it’s not the bacon and eggs, what is it?
That’s why I was glad to see at least a few stories today like the one in U.S. News and World Report addressing just that. It’s titled, “Six ways to reduce inflammation — without a statin or a heart test.” It’s worth a read, if you’re interested.


2 Comments